Case-control study shows significant link between PON2 polymorphism and coronary artery disease risk in North Indian Punjabis, indicating genetic influence on health.
Background Paraoxonases (PONs) are a unique family of calcium-dependent enzymes which are tightly associated with the high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), plays a crucial role in protecting the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) from oxidation, thereby providing protection against atherosclerosis-a key factor for the pathogenesis of coronary artery disease (CAD). The activity of PON enzymes is influenced by genetic polymorphisms in the PON genes. The present case-control study was performed to investigate the association of PON1 (p.L55M, rs854560) and PON2 (p.S311C, rs7493) polymorphisms with CAD in the North Indian Punjabi population. Methods and results The present study included 211 CAD patients and 260 healthy controls genotyped using the polymerase chain reaction-reaction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) technique. Binary logistic regression analysis revealed that the SC and CC genotypes of the PON2 (p.S311C) conferred 2-and 3.5-folds increased risk for CAD (OR: 2.03, 95%CI: 1.36-3.01, p=0.001; OR: 3.49, 95%CI: 1.86-6.55, p=0.001, respectively). Moreover, the dominant (OR: 2.29, 95%CI: 1.58-3.32, p=0.0001), co-dominant (OR: 1.62, 95%CI: 1.11-2.36, p=0.012), recessive (OR: 2.58, 95%CI: 1.41-4.72, p=0.001), and log-additive (OR: 1.92, 95%CI: 1.46-2.54, p=0.0001) are the best-fit inheritance models to predict the susceptible gene effects. Furthermore, the LC haplotype (PON1 and PON2) was found to be significantly and independently associated with the increased risk of CAD (OR: 2.34, 95%CI: 1.65-3.32, p=0.0001). Conclusions Our results indicate a significant and independent association of PON2 (p.S311C) polymorphism with CAD even after gender stratification in North Indian Punjabi population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bhat et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: