In this paper, the reaction of electron-positron annihilation into <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><a:mrow><a:msubsup><a:mrow><a:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</a:mi></a:mrow><a:mrow><a:mi>c</a:mi></a:mrow><a:mrow><a:mo>+</a:mo></a:mrow></a:msubsup><a:msubsup><a:mrow><a:mover accent="true"><a:mrow><a:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</a:mi></a:mrow><a:mrow><a:mo stretchy="false">¯</a:mo></a:mrow></a:mover></a:mrow><a:mrow><a:mi>c</a:mi></a:mrow><a:mrow><a:mo>−</a:mo></a:mrow></a:msubsup></a:mrow></a:math> is investigated. The <g:math xmlns:g="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><g:msubsup><g:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</g:mi><g:mi>c</g:mi><g:mo>+</g:mo></g:msubsup><g:msubsup><g:mover accent="true"><g:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</g:mi><g:mo stretchy="false">¯</g:mo></g:mover><g:mi>c</g:mi><g:mo>−</g:mo></g:msubsup></g:math> scattering amplitudes are obtained by solving the Lippmann-Schwinger equation. The contact, annihilation, and two pseudoscalar-exchange potentials are taken into account in the spirit of the chiral effective field theory. The amplitudes of <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><m:msup><m:mi>e</m:mi><m:mo>+</m:mo></m:msup><m:msup><m:mi>e</m:mi><m:mo>−</m:mo></m:msup><m:mo stretchy="false">→</m:mo><m:msubsup><m:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</m:mi><m:mi>c</m:mi><m:mo>+</m:mo></m:msubsup><m:msubsup><m:mover accent="true"><m:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</m:mi><m:mo stretchy="false">¯</m:mo></m:mover><m:mi>c</m:mi><m:mo>−</m:mo></m:msubsup></m:math> are constructed by the distorted wave Born approximation method, with the final state interactions of the <t:math xmlns:t="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><t:msubsup><t:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</t:mi><t:mi>c</t:mi><t:mo>+</t:mo></t:msubsup><t:msubsup><t:mover accent="true"><t:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</t:mi><t:mo stretchy="false">¯</t:mo></t:mover><t:mi>c</t:mi><t:mo>−</t:mo></t:msubsup></t:math> rescattering implemented. By fitting to the experimental data, the unknown couplings are fixed, and high-quality solutions are obtained. With these amplitudes, the individual electromagnetic form factors in the timelike region, <z:math xmlns:z="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><z:msubsup><z:mi>G</z:mi><z:mi>E</z:mi><z:msub><z:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</z:mi><z:mi>c</z:mi></z:msub></z:msubsup></z:math>, <cb:math xmlns:cb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><cb:msubsup><cb:mi>G</cb:mi><cb:mi>M</cb:mi><cb:msub><cb:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</cb:mi><cb:mi>c</cb:mi></cb:msub></cb:msubsup></cb:math>, and their ratio, <fb:math xmlns:fb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><fb:msubsup><fb:mi>G</fb:mi><fb:mi>E</fb:mi><fb:msub><fb:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</fb:mi><fb:mi>c</fb:mi></fb:msub></fb:msubsup><fb:mo>/</fb:mo><fb:msubsup><fb:mi>G</fb:mi><fb:mi>M</fb:mi><fb:msub><fb:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</fb:mi><fb:mi>c</fb:mi></fb:msub></fb:msubsup></fb:math>, are extracted. Both modulus and phases are predicted. These individual electromagnetic form factors reveal new insights into the properties of the <jb:math xmlns:jb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><jb:msub><jb:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</jb:mi><jb:mi>c</jb:mi></jb:msub></jb:math>. The separated contributions of the Born term, contact, annihilation, as well as the two pseudoscalar-exchange potentials to the electromagnetic form factors are isolated. It is found that the Born term dominates the whole energy region. The contact term plays a crucial role in the enhancement near the threshold, and the annihilation term is essential in generating the fluctuation of the electromagnetic form factors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guo et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: