We present forecasts for constraints on the Hu and Sawicki <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><a:mi>f</a:mi><a:mo stretchy="false">(</a:mo><a:mi>R</a:mi><a:mo stretchy="false">)</a:mo></a:math> modified gravity model using realistic mock data representative of future cluster and weak lensing surveys. We create mock thermal Sunyaev-Zel’dovich effect selected cluster samples for SPT-3G and CMB-S4 and the corresponding weak gravitational lensing data from next-generation weak-lensing (ngWL) surveys like Euclid and Rubin. We employ a state-of-the-art Bayesian likelihood approach that includes all observational effects and systematic uncertainties to obtain constraints on the <e:math xmlns:e="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><e:mi>f</e:mi><e:mo stretchy="false">(</e:mo><e:mi>R</e:mi><e:mo stretchy="false">)</e:mo></e:math> gravity parameter <i:math xmlns:i="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><i:msub><i:mi>log</i:mi><i:mn>10</i:mn></i:msub><i:mo stretchy="false">|</i:mo><i:msub><i:mi>f</i:mi><i:mrow><i:mi>R</i:mi><i:mn>0</i:mn></i:mrow></i:msub><i:mo stretchy="false">|</i:mo></i:math>. In this analysis we vary the cosmological parameters <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><m:mo stretchy="false">[</m:mo><m:msub><m:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</m:mi><m:mi mathvariant="normal">m</m:mi></m:msub><m:mo>,</m:mo><m:msub><m:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</m:mi><m:mi>ν</m:mi></m:msub><m:msup><m:mi>h</m:mi><m:mn>2</m:mn></m:msup><m:mo>,</m:mo><m:mi>h</m:mi><m:mo>,</m:mo><m:msub><m:mi>A</m:mi><m:mi>s</m:mi></m:msub><m:mo>,</m:mo><m:msub><m:mi>n</m:mi><m:mi>s</m:mi></m:msub><m:mo>,</m:mo><m:msub><m:mi>log</m:mi><m:mn>10</m:mn></m:msub><m:mo stretchy="false">|</m:mo><m:msub><m:mi>f</m:mi><m:mrow><m:mi>R</m:mi><m:mn>0</m:mn></m:mrow></m:msub><m:mo stretchy="false">|</m:mo><m:mo stretchy="false">]</m:mo></m:math>, which allows us to account for possible degeneracies between cosmological parameters and <v:math xmlns:v="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><v:mi>f</v:mi><v:mo stretchy="false">(</v:mo><v:mi>R</v:mi><v:mo stretchy="false">)</v:mo></v:math> modified gravity. The analysis accounts for <z:math xmlns:z="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><z:mi>f</z:mi><z:mo stretchy="false">(</z:mo><z:mi>R</z:mi><z:mo stretchy="false">)</z:mo></z:math> gravity via its effect on the halo mass function which is enhanced on cluster mass scales compared to the expectations within general relativity (GR). Assuming a fiducial GR model, the upcoming cluster dataset <db:math xmlns:db="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><db:mrow><db:mi>SPT</db:mi><db:mtext>−</db:mtext><db:mn>3</db:mn><db:mi mathvariant="normal">G</db:mi><db:mo>×</db:mo><db:mi>ngWL</db:mi></db:mrow></db:math> is expected to obtain an upper limit of <gb:math xmlns:gb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><gb:msub><gb:mi>log</gb:mi><gb:mn>10</gb:mn></gb:msub><gb:mo stretchy="false">|</gb:mo><gb:msub><gb:mi>f</gb:mi><gb:mrow><gb:mi>R</gb:mi><gb:mn>0</gb:mn></gb:mrow></gb:msub><gb:mo stretchy="false">|</gb:mo><gb:mo><</gb:mo><gb:mo>−</gb:mo><gb:mn>5.95</gb:mn></gb:math> at 95% credibility, which significantly improves upon the current best bounds. The <kb:math xmlns:kb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><kb:mrow><kb:mi>CMB</kb:mi><kb:mtext>−</kb:mtext><kb:mi mathvariant="normal">S</kb:mi><kb:mn>4</kb:mn><kb:mo>×</kb:mo><kb:mi>ngWL</kb:mi></kb:mrow></kb:math> dataset is expected to improve this even further to <nb:math xmlns:nb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><nb:msub><nb:mi>log</nb:mi><nb:mn>10</nb:mn></nb:msub><nb:mo stretchy="false">|</nb:mo><nb:msub><nb:mi>f</nb:mi><nb:mrow><nb:mi>R</nb:mi><nb:mn>0</nb:mn></nb:mrow></nb:msub><nb:mo stretchy="false">|</nb:mo><nb:mo><</nb:mo><nb:mo>−</nb:mo><nb:mn>6.23</nb:mn></nb:math>. Furthermore, <rb:math xmlns:rb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><rb:mi>f</rb:mi><rb:mo stretchy="false">(</rb:mo><rb:mi>R</rb:mi><rb:mo stretchy="false">)</rb:mo></rb:math> gravity models with <vb:math xmlns:vb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><vb:msub><vb:mi>log</vb:mi><vb:mn>10</vb:mn></vb:msub><vb:mo stretchy="false">|</vb:mo><vb:msub><vb:mi>f</vb:mi><vb:mrow><vb:mi>R</vb:mi><vb:mn>0</vb:mn></vb:mrow></vb:msub><vb:mo stretchy="false">|</vb:mo><vb:mo>≥</vb:mo><vb:mo>−</vb:mo><vb:mn>6</vb:mn></vb:math>, which have larger numbers of clusters, would be distinguishable from GR with both datasets. We also report degeneracies between <zb:math xmlns:zb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><zb:msub><zb:mi>log</zb:mi><zb:mn>10</zb:mn></zb:msub><zb:mo stretchy="false">|</zb:mo><zb:msub><zb:mi>f</zb:mi><zb:mrow><zb:mi>R</zb:mi><zb:mn>0</zb:mn></zb:mrow></zb:msub><zb:mo stretchy="false">|</zb:mo></zb:math> and <dc:math xmlns:dc="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><dc:msub><dc:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</dc:mi><dc:mi mathvariant="normal">m</dc:mi></dc:msub></dc:math> as well as <hc:math xmlns:hc="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><hc:msub><hc:mi>σ</hc:mi><hc:mn>8</hc:mn></hc:msub></hc:math> for <jc:math xmlns:jc="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><jc:msub><jc:mi>log</jc:mi><jc:mn>10</jc:mn></jc:msub><jc:mo stretchy="false">|</jc:mo><jc:msub><jc:mi>f</jc:mi><jc:mrow><jc:mi>R</jc:mi><jc:mn>0</jc:mn></jc:mrow></jc:msub><jc:mo stretchy="false">|</jc:mo><jc:mo>></jc:mo><jc:mo>−</jc:mo><jc:mn>6</jc:mn></jc:math> and <nc:math xmlns:nc="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><nc:msub><nc:mi>log</nc:mi><nc:mn>10</nc:mn></nc:msub><nc:mo stretchy="false">|</nc:mo><nc:msub><nc:mi>f</nc:mi><nc:mrow><nc:mi>R</nc:mi><nc:mn>0</nc:mn></nc:mrow></nc:msub><nc:mo stretchy="false">|</nc:mo><nc:mo>></nc:mo><nc:mo>−</nc:mo><nc:mn>5</nc:mn></nc:math> respectively. Our forecasts indicate that future cluster abundance studies of <rc:math xmlns:rc="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><rc:mi>f</rc:mi><rc:mo stretchy="false">(</rc:mo><rc:mi>R</rc:mi><rc:mo stretchy="false">)</rc:mo></rc:math> gravity will enable substantially improved constraints that are competitive with other cosmological probes. Published by the American Physical Society 2024
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vogt et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: