The emergence of digital traces as potentially new and complex objects in forensic expert science has led to the natural appearance of several errors made by experts in their research. The monitoring and analysis of judicial and expert practice made it possible to formulate the most obvious subjective and objective errors of judicial experts dictated by a number of both external and internal factors. The essence of each of the errors, the content, theoretical and practical significance of their identification and elimination for expert practice and forensic expert science in general are described.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
S. Z. Shikhalieva (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: