Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In this study, we have synthesized S-substituted benzothiazole derived thiazole bearing bis-Schiff base derivatives (1–19) and characterized via different spectroscopic techniques including NMR and HR-EIMS and then screened against α-amylase and α-glycosidase. All the analogues show excellent inhibitory capability. Analogues 1 (IC50 = 3.18 ± 0.72 µM and 2.30 ± 1.80 µM) and 4 (IC50 = 1.40 ± 0.59 µM and 2.10 ± 0.78 µM) were found to be the strongest among the all in contrast with standard drug acarbose (IC50 = 4.30 ± 0.18 and 6.45 ± 1.84 µM) for α-amylase and α-glycosidase. Some derivatives show good potency against both the enzymes while few were found moderately potent. For all the molecules structure–activity relationship was carried to determine the decrease/increase in potency due to steric hindrance, bulky nature, position, type, size, quantity of the substituent/s on phenyl rings. Molecular docking and ADME analysis were carried out to signify the binding interactions of the most potent derivatives with the active site of enzymes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khan et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: