Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Experimental and computational profiling identifies effective inhibitors in diabetes, suggesting new treatment avenues.
A novel series of benzothiazole scaffolds were presented to test their in vitro α-amylase and α-glucosidase activities for combating diabetes mellitus, which is one of the most rapidly growing diseases. The tested compounds were elucidated structurally by various spectroscopic techniques like 1H NMR, 13C NMR and HRMS. All compounds exhibited a varied range of inhibitory activities against targeted α-amylase and α-glucosidase enzymes, with IC50 values of 1.58 ± 1.20 to 7.54 ± 3.60 µM (α-amylase) and 2.10 ± 1.10 to 8.90 ± 4.10 (α-glucosidase), respectively. The obtained results were compared with the standard acarbose drug, with IC50 values of 0.91 ± 0.20 µM (α-amylase) and 1.80 ± 1.10 µM (α-glucosidase). Specifically, methyl 2-amino-4-((6-methoxypyridin-3-yl)methoxy)benzo[d]thiazole-6-carboxylate (5c) and methyl 4-((6-methoxypyridin-3-yl)methoxy)-2-(thiazole-2-carboxamido)benzo[d]thiazole-6-carboxylate (6b) emerged as potent inhibitors of α-amylase and α-glucosidase enzymes. These potent compounds were further screened for in silico molecular docking studies to investigate possible binding interactions with active sites of targeted enzymes, and results obtained demonstrated that potent compounds exhibited stronger binding affinities toward anti-diabetic enzymes compared to the positive control acarbose.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Al-Joufi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: