Background Cardiovascular disease prevalence in women is high globally, which leads to a great burden of disability, and it is their leading cause of death. Cardiovascular rehabilitation (CR) is an outpatient model of secondary preventive care proven to mitigate this burden; however, significantly fewer women access CR than men, and those that do are less likely to complete the program. Accordingly, women-focused (W-F) models of CR have been developed, to better engage women and optimize their outcomes. Purpose The objectives of this study were to investigate: (1) the implementation of W-F CR by programs around the globe, (2) barriers to delivery of W-F CR, as well as (3) what they would want and need in order to apply the recommendations in their CR programs, particularly with regard to patient education and counselling. Methods In this cross-sectional study, a survey was administered to CR programs via REDCap from May-July/2023. Potential respondents were identified via the International Council of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation’s (ICCPR) network. Results 223 responses were received from 52/111 (46.8% country response rate) countries in the world with any CR, across all 6 World Health Organization regions. Thirty-three (14.8%) programs from 30 countries reported offering any W-F programming. Programs did commonly offer elements preferred by women and recommended, namely: patient choice of session time (n=151, 70.6%), informal care providers/partners invited to sessions (n=121, 57.1%), having CR staff with expertise in women and heart diseases (n=112, 53.3%), separate changerooms for women (n=38, 52.8%), and discussing CR referral with patients (n=112, 52.1%). Main barriers to delivery of W-F exercise were physical resources (n=33; 14.8%), space (n=30, 13.5%), as well as staff time (n=26, 11.7%) and expertise (n=33, 10.3%). Main barriers to delivery of W-F education were human resources (n=114, 51.1%), educational resources (n=26, 11.7%) and expertise in the content (n=74, 33.2%). Enablers of W-F education delivery were availability of materials, in multiple modalities, as well as educated staff, and financial resources. Conclusions Despite the benefits, W-F CR is not commonly offered globally. Considering the barriers and enablers identified, ICCPR is developing resources to expand delivery. Results from this survey will be used to support implementation of the W-F CR Guideline recommendations such as increasing exercise modality options and psychosocial counselling, and development of W-F educational resources. Map.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ghisi et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: