Background common pathophysiological feature favors parallel occurrence of severe pre-eclampsia (PET) and fetal growth restriction. Objective To identify pregnancy and neonatal outcome differences between early-onset and late-onset preeclampsia, in relation to fetal growth restriction (FGR) Methods this retrospective study included 50 singleton pregnancies with FGR and severe PET who were admitted in Ain Shams University Maternity Hospital. Fetal growth restriction was defined as EFW and/or AC < 10th percentile. Preeclampsia with severe features included patients with systolic BP ≥ 160 mmHg, diastolic BP ≥ 110 mmHg, elevated liver transaminases twice the normal values, elevated serum creatinine twice the normal levels, or > 1.1mg/dl, HELLP syndrome, features of impending eclampsia, pulmonary edema, and/or thrombocytopenia with platelets level < 100 x 109/L. obstetric and neonatal outcomes were compared in early and late onset PET. Results The current study revealed that there was no difference between early and late onset PET in fetal and pregnancy outcomes while there was significant difference in neonatal outcomes. Conclusion the current study showed that risk of adverse neonatal outcomes as respiratory distress syndrome and neonatal death were higher in cases with early onset PET.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hassan et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: