Key result
Early-onset preeclampsia was associated with a higher rate of composite adverse neonatal outcomes compared to late-onset preeclampsia.
Why the study?
The risk factors, clinical trends, and maternal and fetal health of early- and late-onset preeclampsia have not been adequately studied.
Does early-onset preeclampsia compared to late-onset preeclampsia worsen maternal and perinatal outcomes in women with preeclampsia?
Cohort (n=300)
No
Does early-onset preeclampsia compared to late-onset preeclampsia worsen maternal and perinatal outcomes in women with preeclampsia?
Early-onset preeclampsia is associated with significantly worse perinatal outcomes compared to late-onset preeclampsia, though maternal outcomes do not differ significantly.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Early-onset preeclampsia may warrant heightened perinatal surveillance; leaves open whether onset timing refines risk stratification beyond current criteria.
OBJECTIVE: The risk factors, clinical trends, and maternal and fetal health of early- and late-onset preeclampsia have not been adequately studied. We examined the effects of early- and late-onset preeclampsia on maternal and perinatal outcomes as well as the known risk factors of preeclampsia. METHODS: One hundred and fifty women with preeclampsia were consecutively enrolled in each group. Those who developed preeclampsia before 34 weeks of gestation were identified as having early-onset preeclampsia, while those who developed at 34 weeks or later were identified as having late-onset preeclampsia. Maternal and perinatal outcomes were compared between groups. A significantly higher number of women with early-onset preeclampsia developed severe features during the disease course, and most required treatment with antihypertensive drugs. Late-onset preeclampsia was more prevalent among primigravid mothers. Babies born to mothers with early-onset preeclampsia had a significantly higher rate of adverse outcomes. CONCLUSION: These study findings indicate that women with early-onset preeclampsia had more adverse outcome than those with late-onset preeclampsia, but the difference was not statistically significant. There were more babies with adverse perinatal outcomes in the early-than late-onset group.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wadhwani et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Preeclampsia (n=300). Early-onset preeclampsia vs. Late-onset preeclampsia was evaluated on Composite neonatal outcome (p=<0.001). Early-onset preeclampsia was associated with a higher rate of composite adverse neonatal outcomes compared to late-onset preeclampsia.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: