In Malaysia, there has been an increasing interest in arts within the urban spaces. Urban art, also known as public art, street art, graffiti and murals is used as a form of creative expression. However, the legal frameworks and complexities surrounding urban art have been underexplored. This study examines the existing legal frameworks and issues governing urban art in Malaysia through qualitative and doctrinal researches that involves a literature review of primary and secondary sources. The findings reveal a fine line between artistic expression and potentially criminal acts, particularly in cases of unauthorised creation. This highlights the urgent need to strengthen legal protection and recognition for artists. The study also highlights the economic benefits of integrating art into urban planning and policies, such as increased tourism and community development. However, analysis of relevant legal frameworks, including the Copyright Act 1987 and the National Heritage Act 2005, reveals their inadequacy in comprehensively addressing legal issues intrinsic to urban art. Therefore, this study concludes that there is a need for improved legal frameworks that protect artists’ rights and support the growth of urban art within the country.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Suriyati Salim (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: