The article is devoted to the substantiation of the fact that the understanding of legal decisions as acts emanating from state-power subjects, creating legal norms or specifying the content of the rights and obligations of participants in legal relations, is unjustifiably narrow. It is proposed to consider a legal decision as a means of presenting legal requirements that reflect the subject’s ideas about fair and expedient, expressing his legal choice and justified by a reference to generally binding legal imperatives or his own subjective law. The author pays special attention to the analysis of the signs of legal decisions and their functions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zykova et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: