The quadcopter controller plays a significant role in autonomous vehicle trajectory tracking and has been extensively examined in the literature because it is a highly nonlinear and under-actuated system.This article contributes by methodically comparing PID, BSC, IBSC, SMC, and ISMC control algorithms under standardized conditions.The study involves implementing these algorithms and optimizing their parameters using a hybrid Flower Pollination Algorithm -Genetic Algorithm (FPA-GA).Robust testing scenarios, including mass uncertainty and time-varying disturbances, are employed to assess algorithmic performance.The research centers on trajectory tracking-control approaches for highly maneuverable Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) equipped with four heave thrusters, emphasizing controller stability through Lyapunov functions.Theoretical exploration precedes comprehensive numerical simulations, enabling a detailed comparison of the efficacy and resilience of the proposed approaches.Results from exhaustive testing reveal the consistent superiority of the BSC controller, demonstrating notably low Integral of Time-weighted Squared Error (ITSE) values of 0.1253 and 0.5262 from two simulation tests.These findings underscore the practical advantages of the BSC controller in highly dynamic UAV trajectory tracking scenarios.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ali et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: