Simulation study demonstrates collision-free motion planning and sway reduction in real-scaled tower cranes, highlighting scalable autonomous construction.
Automating the Tower Crane: Integrating the Development and Simulation of Path Planning and Trajectory Tracking of Tower Crane in ROS Framework Muhammad Muddassir, Mohamed A. A. Abdelkareem, Tarek Zayed, Zoubeir Lafhaj Pages 1065-1072 (2024 Proceedings of the 41st ISARC, Lille, France, ISBN 978-0-6458322-1-1, ISSN 2413-5844) Abstract: In modern construction sites, tower cranes play a crucial role but often rely on multiple human operators. Despite the advancements of the Construction 4.0 era, a comprehensive framework for automated tower crane operations is currently lacking. This study proposes a framework that integrates a real-scaled construction site and tower crane into a physics-based simulation in ROS (robot operating system) framework to enable collision-free motion planning and control. Specifically, we develop time-varying linear quadratic regulators (LQR) for trolley and jib control while employing a proportion-integrated-derivative (PID) method for hoisting control. Additionally, we utilise 5th-order quintic spline trajectories to plan the desired pose of the payload, reducing acceleration discontinuities. The framework's effectiveness is validated through simulations of a real-scaled tower crane and construction site equipped with LiDAR sensors. The results demonstrate that higher-order trajectories effectively minimise oscillations in unactuated systems. Our scalable framework holds promise for real-scale operations in the field of tower crane automation. Keywords: Tower Cranes, Automation in Construction Sites, Time-varying LQR, Robot Operating System (ROS), Underactuated Systems DOI: https://doi.org/10.22260/ISARC2024/0138 Download fulltext Download BibTex Download Endnote (RIS) TeX Import to Mendeley
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Muddassir et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: