Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evaluating Site Scanning Methods: An Assessment System for Quantitative Comparison and Selection Maria Mortazavi, Bin Wu, Sofie Steinbrenner, Shervin Haghsheno Pages 1328-1331 (2024 Proceedings of the 41st ISARC, Lille, France, ISBN 978-0-6458322-1-1, ISSN 2413-5844) Abstract: With the rapid advancement of digitization, a multitude of tools for as-built modeling has emerged, posing a challenge in choosing the most suitable product. This article presents an evaluation system for identifying and selecting a site scanning method to create a digital twin of existing buildings. The evaluation criteria developed for this purpose were integrated into an evaluation scheme that forms the basis for a quantitative assessment. A case study was conducted to validate the developed evaluation system. Two Operating Systems (OS) applications, a Faro laser scanner, and a handheld LumoScanner were selected to generate a 3D model for a floor with a 500 m2 area. The presented method supports construction and design companies in their decision making process when selecting scanning methods for practical building applications. Keywords: Evaluation System, Laser Scanner, OS Scanning Application, As-built Modeling DOI: https://doi.org/10.22260/ISARC2024/0175 Download fulltext Download BibTex Download Endnote (RIS) TeX Import to Mendeley
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mortazavi et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: