Context: Educational games have been increasingly used to make learning fun, interactive, and less massive for the students. This approach is called game-based learning. In Information Systems education, several games can be found to help students better understand real-world situations, the impact of their decisions, and teamwork through a simulated environment. From this perspective, games such as LEARN Board Game, a non-digital game that aims to help teach software architecture through a board and card game, are essential in software architecture professors' tools to solve abstract problems. Problem: LEARN has limitations because it is a non-digital game. For example, we can mention the non-ecological way the game is made (using paper and plastic) and the difficulties of making simple changes, such as changing the text of a card. Solution: Even though it is a tool that helps teachers, its handling could be more satisfactory for those who use it. Thus, this work aimed to build a digital version of LEARN, called D-LEARN, improving its negative points and maximizing its positive points. IS Theory: This research was developed under the aegis of Design Theory, explicitly seeking to adopt a more practical vision, using visual elements through design components to assist learning and teaching. Method: The research and development methodology was the Design Science Research (DSR), which proposes cycles of activities for building or updating an artifact that aims to solve a real-world problem with a pragmatic and satisfactory approach. Results: The digital game obtained an excellent quality score according to the MEEGA+ questionnaire evaluation, surpassing the quality score of the non-digital game. Contributions: The main contribution is to enable a game that assists in teaching software architecture, promoting more significant learning and satisfaction for students.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Caminha et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: