Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Gene editing therapies are designed to minimise off-target editing. However, it is not widespread practice for common polymorphisms to be considered when identifying potential off-target sites in silico. Nevertheless, genetic variants should be included as they have the potential to alter existing, or to generate new, off-target sites. To facilitate the consideration of common polymorphisms when designing targeted gene therapies we developed PopOff, a web-based tool that integrates minor allele frequencies from the gnomAD variant database into an off-target analysis. We used PopOff to analyse predicted off-target loci from guide RNAs used in four clinical trials and thirty-four research publications. From an analysis of sixty guides, we identified that approximately 20% of off-target loci overlap with a common polymorphism. Of these sites, 6.93% contained variants that reduce the level of mismatch between the off-target locus and guide, and therefore may increase off-target cleavage. In addition, we identified that 0.34% of common polymorphisms generated novel PAM sites, resulting in off-target loci that standard workflows would miss. Our findings demonstrate that common polymorphisms should be considered when designing guides to maximise the safety of CRISPR-based gene therapies. However, this may be problematic in populations where the breadth of genetic diversity remains uncharacterised.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Samson et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: