Cross-sectional study reveals advanced liver fibrosis markers in 19.3% of alcohol use disorder patients, highlighting the value of routine baseline screening.
Background Effective screening for alcohol‐associated liver disease is relevant in the context of chronic, excessive alcohol consumption. Patients with alcohol‐associated liver disease are often not diagnosed until their liver disease is decompensated. We analyzed the prevalence and associations of Fibrosis‐4 index (FIB‐4) values suggestive of advanced liver fibrosis in patients referred for their first treatment of alcohol use disorder (AUD). Methods We conducted a cross‐sectional, multicenter study of noncirrhotic individuals referred for their first AUD treatment between March 2013 and April 2021. We obtained sociodemographic data, substance use characteristics, and blood samples at admission. We considered a FIB‐4 value ≥2.67 suggestive of advanced liver fibrosis and used logistic regression analyses to identify features associated with this value. Results We included 604 patients (67% male), with a median age at admission of 48 years [IQR: 41–56 years]. The median duration of regular alcohol consumption was 21 years [IQR: 18–30 years] and the median alcohol consumption was 105 standard drink units (SDU)/week [IQR: 63–160 SDU/week]. A FIB‐4 value ≥ 2.67 was present in 19.3% of cases. These patients reported more frequent binge drinking (75.4% vs. 66%, p = 0.05) than those with FIB‐4 values below 2.67. In multivariate analysis, a history of binge drinking (OR 1.9, 95% CI, 1.05–3.47), anemia (OR 2.95, 95% CI, 1.42–6.11), leukopenia (OR 7.46, 95% CI, 2.07–26.8), and total serum bilirubin >1 mg/dL (OR 6.46, 95% CI, 3.57–11.7) were independently associated with FIB‐4 values ≥2.67. Conclusions One in five patients admitted to treatment for AUD without evidence of decompensated liver disease have FIB‐4 values suggestive of advanced liver fibrosis. The presence of a binge drinking history, anemia, leukopenia, and elevated bilirubin levels is associated with high FIB‐4 values.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zuluaga et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: