Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: The study aimed to develop new training programmes for community pharmacists based on the theory of training needs analysis. Methods: Two phases were conducted. Phase 1 was the pharmacists’ needs analysis using the mixed method with an exploratory sequential design and the Hennessy-Hicks training needs analysis. Eligible pharmacists were requested to rate 44 task items on a 5-point Likert scale for task importance and perceived performance. All data were gathered and analysed using subgroup analysis and exploratory factor analysis for training needs. Phase 2 was the training programme development and verification by a focus group. Results: A total of 365 pharmacists completed the questionnaire, with a response rate of 28.3%. The 44 primary care tasks were grouped into seven main domains based on their importance. Three tasks with wide training gaps (mean gaps > 2.0), i.e., depression screening, home visits, and family planning, were selected for the programme development. The focus group agreed on the programme’s usefulness, practicality, and ease of implementation. Conclusion: The training needs of community pharmacists were evaluated, and three training programmes in primary care pharmacy were developed. The impacts of the training programmes merit further study.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Watcharadamrongkun et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: