This study introduces antifragility in disaster risk governance, suggesting adaptive resilience can enhance ethical outcomes.
This study introduces antifragility as a transformative lens for disaster risk governance, shifting emphasis from restoration to disruption-induced improvement of systems. We distill six principles for operationalizing antifragility in disaster risk reduction contexts and delineate ethical, systemic, and learning-based implications for future resilience. Together, these elements reframe disaster risk governance as dynamic, adaptive, and self-reinforcing amid compounding climate risks.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Geiß et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: