Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PF-07220060 is a novel potent oral CDK4i with significant sparing of CDK6. Preliminary safety and dose escalation data from this phI/IIastudy were previously presented. Here we report updated safety and efficacy data in pts with HR+/HER2− mBC, who progressed on prior CDK4/6i and ET, treated with PF-07220060 + ET. This study in pts with advanced solid tumors was enriched for pts with HR+/HER2− mBC who received ≥2 lines of treatment including ET and CDK4/6i. Prior fulvestrant and chemotherapy were allowed. Study objectives were to assess safety, tolerability, and antitumor activity of PF-07220060 alone and in combination with ET. At data cutoff (Nov 1, 2023), 33 pts received PF-07220060 (300mg/400mg BID) in combination with letrozole or fulvestrant (Parts 1B + 1C). Median age was 62.0y (range 41–82); ECOG PS was 0 (36.4%) or 1. Median prior lines of systemic therapy (advanced setting) was 4.0 (range 1–11). All pts had prior CDK4/6i treatment, 24 (72.7%) had prior fulvestrant, and 22 (66.7%) had prior chemotherapy in the advanced/metastatic setting. Most frequent treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were neutropenia (54.5%; 18.2% Grade 3 [G3]), diarrhea (42.4%; 0% G3), and nausea (42.4%; 3.0% G3), with no >G3 TEAEs. Dose modifications due to TEAEs included: 1 (3.0%) pt discontinued PF-07220060, 5 (15.2%) pts had dose reduction, and 10 (30.3%) pts had dose interruptions. In 25 pts with measurable disease who progressed on prior CDK4/6i + ET, 8 (32.0%) had confirmed RECIST v1.1 objective responses (1 CR, 7 PR). Clinical benefit response (CR, PR, or ≥24 wks stable disease) was seen in 20/33 (60.6%) pts. Median progression-free survival was 8.1 months (95% CI: 5.3, 10.9). Confirmed objective responses (PRs) were observed irrespective of ESR1 or PI3K pathway mutations. PF-07220060 + ET showed a favorable safety profile with few hematologic adverse events and infrequent dose modifications, and promising efficacy despite prior CDK4/6i treatment, irrespective of key mutations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yap et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: