PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 1, 2024Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions0 citationsOpen Access

D-5 | Deciphering the Impact of ECMO in Unstable Pulmonary Embolism: A Critical Outcomes Analysis

View Full Paper
OBOlayiwola BolajiMMMotisola MutemaSSSaeed Shoar

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) in critical care cardiology has increased, yet its clinical outcomes in pulmonary embolism (PE) remain partially understood. This study scrutinizes the in -hospital outcomes of ECMO in patients with unstable PE. Utilizing data from the National Readmission Database from 2016 to 2020, we identified patients presenting with unstable PE, dividing them based on ECMO treatment. Multivariate regression analysis was employed to evaluate ECMO's impact on primary (in-hospital mortality) and secondary outcomes (readmission rates and complications). Table I shows baseline characteristics, and Table II shows the outcome. In patients with pulmonary embolism (PE), those receiving Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) showed higher in-hospital mortality (45% vs. 5%, p < 0.0000) and acute kidney injury (AKI) (69.4% vs. 22%, p < 0.000) compared to non-ECMO patients. ECMO treatment resulted in longer hospital stays (22 vs. 5 days, p < 0.000) and higher hospitalization costs. The 30-day readmission rate was lower in ECMO patients (2.9% vs. 7%, p < 0.0000). Major predictors of readmission and mortality included age, AKI, and LOS. ECMO use in unstable PE is associated with higher in-hospital mortality, increased complications, particularly AKI, and a longer LOS, albeit with a lower readmission rate likely due to the high mortality rate in the index admission. This study underscores the need for careful patient selection and highlights the risk factors that may influence outcomes in ECMO-managed PE patients.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bolaji et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e6c5cab6db643587643f56https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jscai.2024.101699
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1In-Hospital Outcomes and Readmissions in High-Risk Pulmonary Embolism Patients Requiring Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support2025
  2. 2F-44 | In-Hospital Outcomes of Extra-Corporeal Membrane Oxygenation Use in High-Risk Pulmonary Embolism: A National Readmission Database Analysis (2016-2020)2024
  3. 3F-45 | Readmissions in High-Risk Pulmonary Embolism Requiring Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support: A 5-Year National Experience2024
  4. 4Use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in high‐risk acute pulmonary embolism: A systematic review and meta‐analysis2020 · 26 citations
  5. 5885: ECMO FOR HIGH-RISK PULMONARY EMBOLISM: A NATIONAL ANALYSIS OF THE CARDIAC ARREST EXCEPTION2026