Recent studies show that patients without standard modifiable risk factors (SMuRF-less) have poorer outcomes in acute myocardial infarction (AMI). This study explores the risk of post-myocardial infarction complications in this subset of patients, which has not yet been studied. This is a retrospective study using the National Inpatient Sample for hospitalizations between 2017 - 2019. ICD-10 codes identified patients presenting with AMI divided into those with and without SMuRFs (diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, and smoking). The outcomes of interest were mortality and post-AMI complications. Multivariate logistic analysis was used to adjust for age, gender, race, location, and relevant co-morbidities with a p-value <0.2 in univariate screen. 3,476,360 patients were hospitalized with AMI, of which 11.7% were SMuRF-less. Compared to those with one or more SMuRFs, SMuRF-less patients have increased adjusted odds of mortality (OR 2.65, 95% CI 2.58 - 2.72) and post-AMI complications including hemopericardium (OR 2.90, 95% CI 1.79 - 4.79), wall rupture (OR 2.52, 95% CI 1.69 - 3.77), cardiogenic shock (OR 1.84, 95% CI 1.78 - 1.89) and cardiac arrest (OR 1.95, 95% CI 1.89 - 2.02). We observed a substantial increase in the likelihood of post-AMI complications in SMuRF-less patients. This further underscores the need to recognize non-conventional risk factors in coronary artery disease. Future studies may help to clarify these associations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Choi et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: