Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Highlights•Propose to use resilience for performance assessment after system failure recovery.•Considering the time-varying characteristics of the system, using reliability as a resilience indicator.•Using the train control on-board system as an example for application.•The results show that the on-board system's performance decreases by approximately 12 % when it has recovery capability.AbstractTo address the problem of difficult performance assessment of train control on-board system after recovery from failures, we have proposed a resilience assessment methodology that uses reliability as an indicator of system resilience. Since the system failures are time-dependent, we adopted the Discrete Time Bayesian Network method to obtain the system's reliability before and after failure. Subsequently, we used an exponential recovery model to quantify the system's performance curve during the recovery phase, and finally utilized the resilient triangle area method to quantify its resilience size. Analyzing the CTCS3-300T train control on-board system, we found that the resilience of the system with cold standby redundancy design and hot standby redundancy design were 89.44 % and 87.34 %, respectively, indicating a slight decrease in system performance after recovery from failures compared to pre-failure levels. At that time, it was necessary to adjust operational plans based on actual conditions to avoid greater impact on the railway network. This paper realizes performance resilience of train control on-board system after failure recovery, which can be applied to similar systems and provide theoretical references for realizing intelligent maintenance of the high-speed train.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Qi et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: