Aims Comparative unicentric study of patients who underwent hiatal hernia surgery by Nissen fundoplication with and without placement of titanized mesh ('Butterfly'). We present the results obtained including the GER-Q questionnaire evaluating the postoperative clinical situation, as well as the analysis of complications and/or recurrence. Methods Retrospective observational study of patients operated on during 2022. Exclusion criteria were age less than 18 years. Usual variables and a GERD-Q questionnaire and esophagogastroduodenal transit were analyzed. A 180-day follow-up was performed. For this analysis we divided the sample into two groups: group 1 (Nissen fundoplication) and group 2 (fundoplication with mesh). Results Eight patients with hiatal hernia, four in each group. Two type III and two type IV hernias in each group. Laparoscopic approach for 100% of group 1; group 2: 25% was laparoscopic approach and 75%, robotic. No patient presented complications. One patient in group 1 had recurrence, while none in group 2. In the GER-Q the median in group 1 was 4 points, while in group 2 it was 2.5, with the possibility of GERD in the first group being 52% and 18.6% in the second group, p = 0.028. Conclusions Further patient recruitment and studies are needed, but based on these initial results, we believe that the use of butterfly mesh in addition to fundoplication may be a safe and effective alternative.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Balongo-García et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: