Aim: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of different warm-up methods on basic motoric characteristics in badminton players. Method: The sample group of the study consisted of 10 male athletes with a mean age of 21.9 ± 2.2 years, who played badminton at Marmara University Faculty of Sports Sciences. Three different warm-up protocols including traditional warm-up, static warm-up and explosive warm-up were applied to the athletes before the tests. After each warm-up protocol, T Agility Test and 10-meter sprint test were performed. SPSS 26 statistical program was used for data analysis. Results: When the 10 m sprint test results were analyzed, there was no statistically significant difference between the traditional warm-up protocol and the static warm-up and explosive warm-up protocols (r=1.000; r=0.53; p>0.05, respectively), while a statistically significant difference was found between the static warm-up protocol and the explosive warm-up protocol (r=.027; p<0.05). When the agility results were analyzed, there was no statistically significant difference between the traditional warm-up protocol and the static warm-up protocol (r=.611; p>0.05), while a statistically significant difference was found between the traditional warm-up protocol and the explosive warm-up protocol (r=.020; p<0.05) and between the explosive warm-up protocol and the static warm-up protocol (r=.001; p<0.05). Conclusion: In the present study, as a result of the comparison of 3 different warm-up protocols, better results were observed in agility and sprint performance after the explosive warm-up protocol. The effect of all three warm-up methods on improving performance was observed in parallel with many studies. However, certain effect differences were revealed inline with the results. It can be said that explosive warm-up will be more effective on the performance of athletes because the game is fast and the jumping activities are high.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Atasoy et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: