Abstract BACKGROUND There is currently no clear conclusion on the impact of isolated vitamin E in the nutritional composition on the 28-day mortality rate of adult sepsis patients. This study hypothesized that vitamin E could improve outcomes for patients with sepsis. METHODS The primary objective of this project is to evaluate the relationship between Vitamin E and 28-Day Mortality. The secondary objective is to investigate whether variations in Vitamin E administration routes lead to differences in 28-day mortality rates. We analyzed adult sepsis patients (According to the international diagnostic criteria of sepsis3.0) from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV Database (MIMIC-IV). A multivariate regression, propensity score analysis, and interaction effects, survival curve was used to determine the associations between Vitamin E intake and 28-day mortality rates in ICU. RESULTS This cohort study included 25 715 samples and 287 patients treated with the investigational drug. A significant reduction in 28-day mortality was observed among patients who used vitamin E (therapy group) compared to those who did not use it (control group) (HR = 0.71, 95% CI = 0.54~0.93, p=0.014). The adjusted Hazard Ratio was 0.62 (95% CI = 0.47~0.81, p<0.001). In the propensity score matching (PSM) model, the HR values are all <1, and the p-values are all <0.05, with consistent trends in all results. The survival curve demonstrated a significant difference in the same trend before and after propensity score matching (p=0.014). However, the 28-day mortality rate results of intravenous administration of vitamin E compared to other routes of administration is: (HR, 1.77; 95% CI, 0.97-3.21, p=0.062). CONCLUSIONS In a general population of critically ill patients with adult sepsis, use of vitamin E is associated with improved 28-day mortality in ICU. The intravenous administration of vitamin E did not demonstrate better mortality outcomes compared to other routes of administration.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
He et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: