Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In this article, I argue that medical school admissions should be limited to statistically relevant factors. I argue for it based on two other conclusions: a medical school should maximize quality-adjusted medical services per graduate within the overall optimum spending limit and if this is correct, then a medical school should, other things being equal, select medical students who are better than their competitors. I then explore the implications of this argument for whether a medical school admissions system should be holistic and whether it should consider demographic factors. I also consider and respond to a series of objections to the argument.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stephen Kershnar (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: