Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background Implant-based breast augmentation is a gold standard procedure for transfeminine patients to create a more feminine-appearing chest. In many cases, ancillary procedures are performed simultaneously to achieve an optimal aesthetic result. Objectives To determine the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing feminizing gender-affirming breast surgery in a single academic institution. Methods A retrospective electronic chart review of feminizing gender-affirming breast surgery patients at Mayo Clinic, Rochester from 2017 to 2022 was conducted. Patients demographics and surgical outcomes were gathered. A survival analysis was performed to obtain the time-to-event complication rate. Results Over 5 years, 46 patients (92 breasts) were included. The mean age was 39 years (SD ±15), and most had an above-normal Body Mass Index (58.7%). Thirty (65%) had previous gender-affirming surgeries. The mean implant volume was 289 ml (SD ±95; 140 - 520). Most implants were placed in a subglandular plane (81%) with an inframammary fold incision (91.3%). All implants used were smooth round cohesive silicone gel implants. Ancillary procedures were performed in thirty-two patients (69.57%). Eight patients presented complications (4 major vs 4 minor) in a median postoperative follow-up of 372 vs 392 days; at 1-month follow-up, the probability of a complication to have occurred is 2.17% (95% CI: 0–6.3%) vs 5% (95% CI: 0–11.5%) and at 1 year is 10.21% (95% CI: 0–20.9%) vs 12.5% (95% CI: 0–23.4%) which remain the same up to 4 years. Conclusions Breast augmentation with implants is a safe procedure to achieve feminization of the breast with a low rate of complications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Figueroa et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: