The study addressing the self-evaluation of courses and programs in HEIs, currently considered one of the main challenges of the higher education subsystem and the executive. It is believed that the creation of a culture of evaluation in the sector could have a positive impact on the quality of teaching, increasing scientific research and extension practices. The objective of the study is to verify the technical qualifications of the members of the self-evaluation committee (CAA) and assess the extent to which they can be reflected in the results of the self-evaluation process of courses and programs; It was theoretically supported by legislation that regulates higher education. This is a qualitative approach, using semi-structured interviews. Among the results, we highlight the non-adaptation of the IES's internal regulations and processes to Presidential Decree 310/20 and the legislation that regulates assessment in higher education; the longer you remain on the commission, the better the evaluator's performance and contribution to the process; in general, evaluators are not trained in areas related to evaluation and have not even had related training; evaluators have little knowledge of the legislation that regulates the evaluation process. On the other hand, there is a need to carry out a training plan that includes the dimensions of research that involve CAA members, Managers and Administrative Technical Personnel (PTA) in the UNIBELAS self-evaluation process, as well as the need to allocate budget funds to support the process.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lucas et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: