Cosmological parameters can be measured by comparing peculiar velocities with those predicted from a galaxy density field. Previous work has tested the accuracy of this approach with N-body simulations, but generally on idealized mock galaxy surveys. However, systematic biases may arise solely due to survey selection effects such as flux-limited samples, edge-effects, and complications due to the obscuration of the Galactic plane. In this work, we explore the impact of each of these effects individually as well as collectively using the semi-analytic models from numerical simulations to generate mock catalogues that mimic the 2M++ density field. We find the reconstruction and analysis methods used for our 2M++ mocks produce a value of fσ8 that is biased high by a factor 1.04 ± 0.01 compared to the true value. Moreover, a cosmic volume matching that of 2M++ has a cosmic variance uncertainty in fσ8 of ~ 5~\ per\ cent. The systematic bias is a function of distance: it is unbiased close to the origin but is biased slightly high for distances in the range 100–180 h−1 Mpc. Correcting for this small bias, we find that recent peculiar velocity samples yield fσ ₈ˡⁱⁿ = 0.362± 0.023, a value that is in tension with the extrapolations from cosmic microwave background measurements. The predicted peculiar velocities from 2M++ have an error of 170 km s−1 that slowly increases with distance, exceeding 200 km s−1 only at distances of 180–200 h−1Mpc. Finally, the residual bulk flow speeds found in previous work are shown to be not in conflict with those expected in the Λ cold dark matter model.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hollinger et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: