This study examines the effects of derailed (DrLB) and laissez-faire leadership (LLB) on teachers' social engagement with students (TSES) and colleagues (TSEC). A correlational predictive design with a quantitative approach was employed. A total of 397 teachers and 366 students were participants. Data were collected using questionnaires and analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. DrLB and LLB exhibited in CTEs (t (396) = 20.61, Cohn's d = 1.03, p < 0.01) and (t (396) = 26.76, Cohn's d = 1.35, p < 0.01), respectively. Teachers were engaged with students and colleagues (t (396) = 24.34, Cohn's d = 1.22, p < 0.01) and (t (396) = 20.18, Cohn's d = 1.01, p < 0.0) and (t (365) = 7.94, Cohn's d = 0.42, p < 0.01) and (t (365) = 12.45, Cohn's d = 0.66, p < 0.01) from teachers and students' data. There was a significant relationship between TSEC and LLB (r = .751, p < 0.01). DrLB and LLB predict TSES and TEC (Wilks' Λ = .164, F (60, 813) = 9.18, p < .01, partial η2 = .42) and LLB (Wilks' Λ = .17, F (55, 804) = 9.03, p < .01, partial η2 = .4.), respectively. Thus, it can be concluded that teachers are struggling with d DrLB and LLB. Finally, recommendations were forwarded to potential stakeholders such as the regional education bureau, deans, teachers and board members of CTEs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mesfin et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: