Objective: Mixed meal tolerance test stimulated area under the curve (AUC) C-peptide at 12 to 24 months represents the primary endpoint for nearly all intervention trials seeking to preserve beta cell function in recent-onset type 1 diabetes. We hypothesized that participant benefit might be detected earlier and predict outcomes at 12 months post-therapy. Such findings would support shorter trials to establish initial efficacy. Research Design and Methods: We examined data from 6 TrialNet immunotherapy randomized controlled trials in a post-hoc analysis and included additional stimulated metabolic indices beyond C-peptide AUC. We partitioned the analysis into successful and unsuccessful trials and analyzed the data both in the aggregate as well as individually for each trial. Results: Among trials meeting their primary endpoint, we identified a treatment effect at 3 and 6 months when using C-peptide AUC (p=0.030 and <0.001, respectively) as a dynamic measure (i.e., change from baseline). Importantly, no such difference was seen in the unsuccessful trials. C-peptide AUC as a 6-month dynamic measure not only detected treatment efficacy but also suggested long-term C-peptide preservation (R2 for 12-month C-peptide AUC adjusted for age and baseline value=0.80, p<0.001), and supported the concept of smaller trial sizes down to 54 participants. Conclusions: Early dynamic measures can identify a treatment effect among successful immune therapies in type 1 diabetes trials with good long-term prediction and practical sample size over a 6-month period. While external validation of these findings is required, strong rationale and data exist in support of shortening early phase clinical trials.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jacobsen et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: