The methods allow for evaluating expert competence and correcting assessments based on the working group's outcomes.
The proposed methods make it possible to carry out a posteriori assessment of the competence of experts and the subsequent correction of a priori competence, taking into account the effectiveness of the work of experts in building an attribute model, as well as to identify and evaluate the shortcomings made by the working group during the preparation of the expertise. Both methods are based on a comparison of private attribute models with the resulting model of the object of expertise. After processing and analyzing the results of each expert's survey, a posteriori assessment of his competence is determined, which is compared with the a priori assessment in order to recalculate the latter in such a way that it adequately reflects the expert's level of professional knowledge and specialized skills revealed during the expertise.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Burkov et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: