Maximizing resiliency in complex systems can be viewed as a multi-objective optimization that includes system performance, survivability, economic and social factors. Systems requiring high survivability typically require one or more redundant (standby) subsystems, which increases system cost. To optimize the tradeoffs between system survivability and cost, this paper introduces an approach for obtaining the Pareto-optimal set of design candidates ("resilience frontier"). The method combines Monte Carlo (MC) sampling to estimate total survivability and a genetic algorithm (GA), referred to as the MCGA, to obtain the resilience frontier. The MCGA is demonstrated through several numerical case studies. The results of the case studies indicate that the MCGA approach shows promise as a tool for evaluating survivability versus cost tradeoffs and also as a potential design tool for choosing system configuration and components to maximize overall system resiliency.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Younes et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: