⌘+K

Pulse Explore Clubs Researchers Journals

Home Clubs Explore

April 9, 2024Neurology

Management of Myasthenia Gravis Around the Globe: Consensus Guidelines vs. Realities of Practice (P10-11.018)

Julia Greenberg Aravind Ganesh Kiril Kiprovski Sujata Thawani

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Abstract

To explore practices surrounding MG management across the globe with regard to alignment with the 2016 and 2020 international consensus guidelines.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

Greenberg et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e6fdadb6db643587677cc0 https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.0000000000204482

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Keep reading

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

1Taiwan Clinical Practice Guidelines for Myasthenia GravisSystematic Review · 2026
2A Delphi consensus on integrating novel therapies into the management of generalized myasthenia gravisEarly-Phase Clinical Trial · 2026
3A Delphi consensus on integrating novel therapies into the management of generalized myasthenia gravis.Early-Phase Clinical Trial · 2026
4Treatment Goals in Myasthenia Gravis: Expert Consensus Recommendations Using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method (P4-9.004)Original Research · 2026
5National Consensus Guidance for Management of Refractory Myasthenia GravisReview · 2024 · 3 citations