We propose a novel predictor of equity mutual fund performance, "strategy consistency," defined as the degree to which a fund picks stocks most chosen collectively by managers with a similar self-declared principal investment strategy. Using a proprietary strategy classification based on textual analysis of fund prospectuses, we show that high-consistency funds earn significantly higher abnormal returns than low-consistency funds. Moreover, high-consistency funds with the strongest prior-month performance earn significantly positive abnormal returns of 4% per annum. Our results provide a possible explanation why most mutual funds underperform their benchmarks: they pick stocks that do not closely align with their primary strategy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Detzel et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: