Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The conduction band edge ( E CB ) energy levels of a mesoporous TiO 2 film were investigated in aprotic dimethylformamide (DMF) and aqueous media to explore the influence of various proton additives and electron donors. Spectroelectrolysis (SE) technique was employed to measure the E CB in non‐aqueous solvents, revealing a significantly negative E CB in dry non‐aqueous solvents compared to values obtained in aqueous solvents. In non‐aqueous DMF, the E CB of TiO 2 was found to be highly dependent on the proton‐donating additive due to the establishment of a proton adsorption–desorption equilibrium, reaching –(1.42–1.94) V versus SCE. The introduction of a well‐known electron donor, 1,3‐dimethyl‐2‐phenyl‐1,3‐dihydrobenzimidazole (BIH) led to a slight positive shift in the TiO 2 E CB , indicating that the electron donor contributes to the to the CB energetics of the mesoporous TiO 2 films. Under aqueous conditions and in the presence of various electron donors (TEA, TEOA, ascorbic acid, EDTA•2Na, and sodium ascorbate), the proton‐donating/accepting capacity of the additive significantly influenced the pH of the aqueous solvent, causing changes in the TiO 2 E CB across the electrolyte solution. This study emphasizes the crucial role of proton additives and electron donors in influencing the CB energetics of mesoporous TiO 2 electrodes and aims to determine the extent to which the E CB of TiO 2 can shift as a result of the adsorption and intercalation of protons on its surface. The findings obtained herein contribute to the understanding of the energy efficiency of TiO 2 ‐mediated photocatalytic systems in various solvent environments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Choi et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: