Qualitative analysis identifies adherence influences in cancer patients using social cognitive theory, indicating complex interactions.
PURPOSE Oral anticancer agents (OAAs) have transformed cancer treatment by allowing home-based therapy, but adherence remains suboptimal in real-world practice. Guided by Social Cognitive Theory (SCT), this study examined behavioral, cognitive, and socioenvironmental determinants of OAA adherence. PATIENTS and METHODS We conducted 36 semi-structured interviews with adult cancer patients receiving OAA monotherapy at an academic medical center, a large urban facility, and a rural facility. Interviews were analyzed using a critical realist approach to thematic analysis, deductively guided by SCT. Themes were organized according to the World Health Organization (WHO) dimensions of adherence. RESULTS Five interrelated themes shaped adherence across WHO dimensions: [I feel] very confident I am staying positive about it: Knowledge, Skills, and Self-Efficacy; They will stop me from speaking: Communication and Trust with Providers; We are at Their Mercy: Logistical Factors in Prescription Refills and Shipment; Who can afford that?: Distress Related to High Costs and Insurance Coverage Challenges; and My wife knows sometimes I forget: Family and Social Support in OAAs Adherence. These findings reflected SCT constructs including self-efficacy, behavioral capability, reinforcement, observational learning, and reciprocal determinism, highlighting the dynamic interactions among personal, social, and health system factors in adherence behavior. CONCLUSION OAA adherence is shaped by multilevel determinants that extend beyond individual barriers to include provider communication, system logistics, financial burden, and social support. Interventions to improve adherence should be theory-informed, multidisciplinary, and patient-centered, addressing behavioral, relational, and structural influences simultaneously.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ayehu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: