Objective: This study evaluated the effect of layer thickness, model inner structure, and implantangulation on the accuracy of 3D printed models with repositional analogs. Materials andmethods: 126 models designed to receive all-on-4 implant retained fixed dental prosthesiswere 3D printed. Models were divided into 2 groups (n=63) according to posterior implantangulation (Group 1; 30 ᵒ and group 2;45 ᵒ). The models were then divided into three subgroups(n=21) according to the printing layer thickness (Group a; 50 µm, group b; 100 µm, and group c;150 µm). Each subgroup was later subdivided into 3 divisions (n=7) according to the modelinner structure (Group I; solid, group II; hollow, and group III; honeycomb). Trueness wasanalyzed using Geomagic controlX analysis software by comparing the model scans to thereference model STL file. Results: Both inner structure and layer thickness had a significanteffect on the final accuracy. Implant angulation had no effect on the finalaccuracy of the printed model. Regarding layer thickness, tukeys post-hoc testrevealed that both 100 µm (24.9± 2.4) and 150 µm (24.5 ± 1.1) layer thickness showed higheraccuracy than the 50 µm (27.9 ± 2.4). As for model form, tukeys post hoc testrevealed that the solid (24.9 ± 1.4) and honeycomb (25 ± 1.5) models were more accurate thanthe hollow models (27.5±3.3). Conclusion: Implant angulation had no effect on the finalaccuracy of the model. Both 50 µm print layer thickness and hollow model inner structureshowed the least accuracy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nouh et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: