Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Introduction : Stroke is a disease with high mortality and morbidity. Currently, there are no specific laboratory markers that can replace or improve clinical and radiological diagnosis and prognosis. We evaluated the role of C-reactive protein (CRP), fibrinogen and D-dimer in predicting short-term outcomes in acute ischemic stroke. Methods : We included 118 acute ischemic stroke patients, admitted within 24 h of onset, mean age 72.73±10.08 years. The severity of the stroke was assessed by the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), and for poor outcome (PO) we accepted a severe functional deficit at the end of the hospital stay with NIHSS ≥15, and for good outcome (GO) – NIHSS ≤ 14. In all patients, we monitored the dynamics of CRP, fibrinogen and D-dimer and evaluated their predictive value regarding to the PO and GO of the stroke. Results : D-dimer had the strongest poor predictive value at admission (p<0.001). Six hours after admission, CRP, D-dimer or both were higher in PO patients (p=0.046, p=0.022 and p=0.006, respectively). At the 24.h, only CRP could be used to predict PO (p<0.001). Elevated CRP, D-dimer or both have been determined as strong indicators of PO with 72 hours of admission (p<0.001, p=0.032 and p=0.001, respectively). Fibrinogen levels were higher 72 hours after admission without a significant relationship with the NIHSS. Conclusion : Changes in routine biomarkers CRP and D-dimer, but not fibrinogen, can predict short-term stroke prognosis and may be associated with the risk of early neurological deterioration or death during hospital stay.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Popovska et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: