This article asks what we might make of Samuel Beckett’s persistent aesthetic and ethical commitment to waiting during a moment shot through with calls to action in the face of extinction events and climate catastrophe. Concentrating on Beckett’s ‘grey time’ and interest in Freud’s death drive, I argue that Beckett’s work uses the temporal suspension of the ‘meanwhile’ to attend to how bodies and selves endure through time when there has been a withdrawal of care for the version of the human that has imagined itself able to produce and mark the end of multiple human and more-than-human others. Beckett’s scenes of endless ending, as forms of what Leo Bersani might call ‘willed lessness’, carefully return us to the ongoing relationship within and between human and more-than-human worlds, sustained according to different configurations of intensity. In the place of action, what persists in the ‘meanwhile’ is a drive that ‘de-dramatizes’ the human as a ‘subject of knowledge’, so that things might die in their own time and after their own fashion.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Laura Salisbury (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: