This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
The objective of this study was to conduct a systematic comparison of the effects of different vehicle display devices on users' motion sickness responses. To assess these effects, participants with varying sensitivities to motion sickness were selected to use multiple vehicle displays while watching videos. The evaluation of motion sickness responses was primarily based on the standardized Simulator Sickness Questionnaire (SSQ) and relevant electroencephalogram (EEG) indicators. The findings indicated that the types of vehicle displays differed in their ability to induce motion sickness. These findings have significant implications for the design and improvement of vehicle display devices. This information can be utilized by manufacturers to optimize product designs, thereby enhancing user comfort and satisfaction, reducing the occurrence of motion sickness, and ultimately advancing the development of vehicle display technology and enhancing user experience.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: