Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Wood densification itself does not, in general, improve the fire-retardant properties sufficiently to reach the standard requirements. The object of this study was to enhance the fire-retardant properties of thermo-mechanically densified wood without any loss of moisture stability and hardness. Scots pine sapwood was pretreated before densification by impregnation with a fire retardant (FR) consisting of ammonium dihydrogen phosphate and urea and then cured in-situ by hot pressing at 150°C or 210°C. Densified specimens without FR were used as a control. Set-recovery, fire retardancy in an open flame test, and Brinell hardness were determined. The set-recovery was slightly reduced as a result of the FR treatment, but the pressing temperature and time had a much greater influence. In the open flame test, specimens without FR-treated ignited within 15−50 s of exposure to the flame, whereas all the FR-treated specimens exhibited ignition resistance over the 10 min duration of the test. Water-soaking cycles had no impact on the ignition resistance in these groups, indicating a strong resistance to water leaching of FR after pressing at 210°C for 60 min. The hardness increased due to the presence of FR after pressing at 210°C, but sharply decreased after water immersion.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Scharf et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: