Taking Texts Seriously

Many international law scholars have found inspiration in quantitative methods of text analysis in recent years. Such methods enable scholars to identify patterns in large quantities of text and challenge pre-existing assumptions about various aspects of international law, how it is developed, practiced, interpreted and applied. Yet, subjecting legal texts to quantitative methods of analysis also comes with notable shortcomings. When treating texts as abstract data in accordance with the logic of data science, researchers often fail to appreciate texts as means of human interaction and communication, thereby diverting attention from terms and meaning to numbers and statistics. The aim of this article is threefold: to offer a lay of the land of the burgeoning empirical legal scholarship that adopts text analytical approaches in its study of international law, exhibit what gets lost when insights from linguistics are ignored, and demonstrate what is gained when they are not.