Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Background: Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is the gold standard modality for evaluating cardiac morphology, function, and hemodynamics in clinical practice. While artificial intelligence (AI) is expected to contribute to improved accuracy and is being applied clinically, its impact on daily clinical practice has not been fully evaluated. Methods: We retrospectively examined 30 consecutive patients who underwent AI-equipped TTE at a single institution. All patients underwent manual and automatic measurements of TTE parameters using the AI-equipped TTE. Measurements were performed by three sonographers with varying experience levels: beginner, intermediate, and expert. Results: A comparison between the manual and automatic measurements assessed by the experts showed extremely high agreement in the left ventricular (LV) filling velocities (E wave: r = 0.998, A wave: r = 0.996; both p < 0.001). The automated measurements of LV end-diastolic and end-systolic diameters were slightly smaller (−2.41 mm and −1.19 mm) than the manual measurements, although without significant differences, and both methods showing high agreement (r = 0.942 and 0.977, both p < 0.001). However, LV wall thickness showed low agreement between the automated and manual measurements (septum: r = 0.670, posterior: r = 0.561; both p < 0.01), with automated measurements tending to be larger. Regarding interobserver variabilities, statistically significant agreement was observed among the measurements of expert, intermediate, and beginner sonographers for all the measurements. In terms of measurement time, automatic measurement significantly reduced measurement time compared to manual measurement (p < 0.001). Conclusions: This preliminary study confirms the accuracy and efficacy of AI-equipped TTE in routine clinical practice. A multicenter study with a larger sample size is warranted.
Shiokawa et al. (Sun,) studied this question.