Key result
AI-assisted 3D echocardiography reduces RV analysis time by ~30% compared to manual 2D methods.
Why the study?
Data on the agreement of AI-assisted semi-automated 3D TTE right ventricular function analyses with manual 2D measurements in routine clinical practice remain limited.
Does AI-assisted semi-automated 3D TTE reduce analysis time compared to manual 2D TTE for right ventricular function assessment in patients undergoing routine echocardiography?
Cross-Sectional (n=201)
Does AI-assisted semi-automated 3D TTE reduce analysis time compared to manual 2D TTE for right ventricular function assessment in patients undergoing routine echocardiography?
Effect estimate: 30% reduction
p-value: p=<0.001
AI-assisted semi-automated 3D echocardiography reduces right ventricular function analysis time by 30% compared to manual 2D methods, despite frequent need for minor manual border adjustments.
BACKGROUND: Advances in three-dimensional (3D) transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) with artificial intelligence (AI) enable AI-assisted semi-automated right ventricular (RV) function analysis, including two-dimensional (2D) measurements. However, data on the agreement of these semi-automated analyses in routine clinical practice remain limited. This study evaluates the agreement of AI-based 3D TTE semi-automated measurements compared to manual 2D TTE measurements. METHODS: We enrolled 201 patients who underwent both 2D and 3D TTE between July and November 2023. AI-assisted semi-automated measurements of right ventricular morphology and functional parameters were performed using 3D Auto RV software. While echocardiographic images were acquired manually by the operators in a conventional manner, the AI-assisted analysis was applied specifically during the post-acquisition offline processing stage. RESULTS: The feasibility of RV measurement using the AI-based software was 84.8% (201/237) among patients with available 3D datasets, and the overall applicability was 67.4% (201/298) across all consecutive patients undergoing routine echocardiography. Among the 201 analyzed cases, fully automated analysis without manual correction was feasible in 10.9% (22/201), while the remaining 89.1% required manual adjustments of the endocardial borders to ensure clinical accuracy. Time for analysis was significantly shorter with the AI-assisted semi-automated method compared to the manual 2D method (30% reduction, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: AI-based 3D TTE semi-automated measurement has the potential to enhance the efficiency and reproducibility of RV function assessment, reducing examiner workload and improving clinical workflow.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shiokawa et al. (2026) reported a cross-sectional. AI-assisted 3D TTE semi-automated right ventricular measurement vs. Manual 2D TTE measurements was evaluated on Time for analysis (30% reduction, p=<0.001). AI-assisted semi-automated 3D echocardiography reduced right ventricular analysis time by 30% compared to manual 2D methods (p<0.001), although 89.1% of cases required manual adjustment.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: