Purpose: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SNB) is used for axillary staging in early breast cancer. Benign SNB lacks therapeutic benefit whereas a malignant SNB results in added cost and risks of a second procedure if axillary clearance is undertaken. SNB preoperative prediction could avoid unnecessary surgery or facilitate a single-stage procedure. We aimed to create and evaluate AI models for clinically node-negative patients to predict SN status (benign/malignant). Methods: Data was collected prospectively from the Breast Cancer Foundation National Register NZ. 303 patients that underwent SNB were included. 4 classification algorithms: k Nearest Neighbour (kNN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Decision Tree (DT), Naïve Bayes (NB) were selected for training. SN histology was used as a target; micrometastasis and larger deposits were defined as malignant. Preoperative data used were: age, tumour type, side, size, grade, location, multifocality and ER/PR/HER2 status. K fold cross validation, partitioning the cohort into k fold subsamples (k=10) was utilised. k-minus-1 fold (90%) was used for training and the remaining k fold (10%) for validation. The partitioning occurred 10 times over. Results: Mean age was 56 and mean tumour size was 21mm. 27% (81/303) had malignant SLN. 22% (66/303) had multifocality. Classifiers that performed well in predicting final SNB histology were: kNN, in one test fold had accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, AUC of 73%, 75%, 73% and 76% respectively and DT's results were 73%, 75%, 73%, 76%. NB and SVM's best accuracy was 69% and 73% respectively. Conclusion: Classifiers showed potential as decision-supporting tools for predicting SNB status. Further work is underway to improve the model for clinical utility.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jassal et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: