Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
March 20, 2024World Journal of UrologyOpen Access

PSA-density, DRE, and PI-RADS 5: potential surrogates for omitting biopsy?

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

FFFabian FalkenbachFAFrancesca AmbrosiniMKMykyta Kachanov

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Falkenbach et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e732cdb6db6435876ac35chttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-024-04894-6
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1PI-RADS category and biopsy-confirmed clinically significant prostate cancer in a selected Ecuadorian multiparametric MRI cohort: a cross-sectional diagnostic study2026
  2. 2Precision in prostate cancer detection: integrating prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD) and the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) to provide additional risk stratification for a more accurate diagnostic decision2024 · 10 citations
  3. 3PI-RADS upgrading as the strongest predictor for the presence of clinically significant prostate cancer in patients with initial PI-RADS-3 lesions2024 · 9 citations
  4. 4Predicting Prostate Cancer in PI-RADS 1–2 Lesions: The Role of Prostate-Specific Antigen Density, Digital Rectal Examination, and Family History2025
  5. 5To Biopsy or Not Biopsy, That is the Question - PI-Rads 3 Prostate Lesions – Validation of Clinical and Radiological Parameters for Biopsy Decision-Making2025