Introduction: Evidence is limited regarding the effect of lifestyle modification on health outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Hypothesis: We hypothesized that lifestyle modification involving the DASH diet, exercise and weight loss would improve blood pressure (BP) and cardiovascular disease (CVD) biomarkers in CKD patients with resistant hypertension. Methods: The Treating Resistant Hypertension Using Lifestyle Modification to Promote Health (TRIUMPH) trial randomized patients with resistant hypertension to either a 16-week cardiac rehabilitation (CR) facility-based lifestyle modification program involving thrice weekly aerobic exercise and weekly classes on DASH diet and behavioral weight loss (C-LIFE) or to a standard education and physician advice (SEPA) control condition. We conducted a secondary analysis involving participants with CKD. CKD was defined as having eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 or albuminuria at baseline. Primary outcome was mean change in clinic systolic BP. Secondary outcomes were mean changes in clinic diastolic BP, 24-hour ambulatory BP, and CVD biomarkers including baroreflex sensitivity (BRS), high-frequency heart rate variability, flow-mediated dilation, pulse wave velocity, and left ventricular mass index. Results: Ninety-seven (69%) of 140 TRIUMPH participants were considered to have CKD. Mean age was 62 years, 57% self-identified as Black race, 67% were male, and the majority (82%) had CKD stage 3. Participants with CKD randomized to C-LIFE achieved greater reduction in clinic SBP and greater improvement in BRS compared to SEPA. There were no differences between groups in ambulatory BP or other CVD biomarkers. Conclusions: A structured 16-week diet, exercise and weight management program conducted in a CR setting improved BP and resting BRS in resistant hypertension patients with CKD. Future studies are needed to confirm the beneficial effect of multi-component lifestyle modification on CVD biomarkers in CKD and to determine the persistence of benefit over time.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tyson et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: