Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The results of a 16-year study of the autoch-thonous Don grapevine variety Durman are pre-sented in comparison with the control variety Risling Rejnskij. The research was carried out in 2008−2023 at the Don ampelographic collec-tion named after Ya.I. Potapenko (Novocher-kassk, Rostov region). The varieties are culti-vated in a grafted (Kober 5 BB) cover crop. The study was carried out using generally ac-cepted methods in viticulture and National standards. According to the results of long-term observations, the Durman grapevine varie-ty has a high agrobiological potential in the cli-matic conditions of the Lower Don region (66% of open buds, 77% of fruitful shoots, fruiting coefficient 1.2, average bunch weight 173 g, yield 11.3 t/ha). The average estimated yield of the Risling Rejnskij variety was 4.5 t/ha, which is 2.5 times less than that of Dur-man variety. Durman variety has an early-medium ripening period (133 days). Upon reaching technological maturity, it accumulates 20.7 g/100 cm3 of sugars with a titratable acidi-ty of 6.5 g/dm3. Dry white wine from Durman variety is pale straw in color, the aroma has muscat-spicy tones, the taste is harmonious and full. Wine tasting score: 8.6 points. The wine from the control Risling Rejnskij variety re-ceived a score of 8.7 points. The article presents data from the molecular genetic passport of Durman variety (for six microsatellite loci). Based on the results of the studies, it was con-cluded that Durman grapevine variety is advis-able to use for producing high-quality dry white wines, as well as a mother form in breeding for crop quality. The disadvantage of this variety is functionally female type of flower, so it is rec-ommended to grow it in mixed plantings, inside an array, to improve the quality of pollination.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Naumova et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: